
Section 5 Formulation of Alternative Plans
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
5-60
Florida Cement and CSR Rinker. Recent concerns with cement availability have
proven Florida is in a unique market with demand exceeding all historic records.
Florida was named a leading national “hot market” with the other two prevalent
developing geographic areas, Texas and California. In 2001, estimating future
projects, recently or currently bidding, developed concrete unit pricing of $65/CY.
For these same projects, estimating now has concrete at $95/CY (a 46%
increase). Regional cement production increases are under development, but
much will go to current distribution networks and record level imported cement
is also linked to Florida cement operators. Expansion efforts by the cement
industry typically take up to four years with permitting and construction.
Fuel pricing variability will apply nearly equal to both Earthen Embankment
and RCC alternatives. Alternative pool depths also affect quantities of materials
to be placed and operations costs of fuel-powered equipment. December 2004
pricing for on-road and off-road diesel was $1.19 and $0.93. Mid-2005 estimated
pricing is $2.01 and $1.80 (+67% and +94%). While the RCC footprint is smaller,
it involves hauling from a central batch plant and is equipment sensitive for
placing.
Site and geology risks include additional foundation preparation required for
RCC where cap rock thins out, and available quantities of near by borrow source
materials for both systems. Current assumptions for foundation prep and
correction of defects are estimated at approximately 20% for RCC embankment.
RCC requires general removal of peat and undesirable surface material cleanup,
dental concrete work; thin caprock and existing cavities sections require full or
partial depth RCC placement. Formation of cracks will contribute to through
seepage (no waterstops). An Earthen Embankment requires general removal of
peat and undesirable surface material cleanup, and some dental concrete work.
The basic difference in site and geology relates to quantities of materials to be
placed. The RCC section has an advantage with the smaller footprint and less
total quantities of materials placed. The seepage canals provide most of the
needed materials – blasted rock, silty-sands, and remaining is quarried near the
centrally located batch plants. The Earthen Embankment also uses the seepage
canals and central borrow areas for available embankment fill materials. The
interior for both systems includes earth embankments that are soil-cement and
riprap covered, and these embankments are placed to reduce wave run up.
Silty-sands excavated in the wet require drying by turning and disking prior to
use. RCC is given an advantage for erosion control as the Earthen Embankment
requires riprap to the top of inside face and stone for crest as a wearing surface.
Seepage control is provided by bentonite filled slurry walls. The depths of the
slurry wall for the Earthen Embankment vary from 35- to 50-Foot. The depth of
the slurry wall is 50-Feet for RCC due to having a smaller section increasing.
Komentarze do niniejszej Instrukcji