Wenger 72944 Dokumentacja Strona 164

  • Pobierz
  • Dodaj do moich podręczników
  • Drukuj
  • Strona
    / 386
  • Spis treści
  • BOOKMARKI
  • Oceniono. / 5. Na podstawie oceny klientów
Przeglądanie stron 163
Section 5 Formulation of Alternative Plans
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
5-10
reservoirs) and because a marsh habitat would have to be kept hydrated, the
evapotranspiration loss would be much higher than for reservoirs, thereby
significantly reducing the storage value of these areas. A long, rectangular
configuration would have a 75% longer levee than a traditional storage reservoir,
thus increasing environmental impacts, project cost, and the area devoted to
seepage management features. Because nutrient-laden soil would be flooded for
the flow-way, the vegetation most likely to dominate would be cattails and other
invasive exotics that would degrade the Everglades habitat.
Flow-ways would not “hold back” water going to the WCAs and the delivery of
that water would exacerbate the already high stages in the northern parts of the
WCAs. Thus, the timing of flows from flow-ways would not be manageable or
beneficial for the remaining Everglades. Perhaps the most crucial element,
water flowing from the lake to the WCAs is not present in dry or even normal
years. For example, during long periods (e.g., from 1970-1982 and 1985-1994 in
the hydrologic modeling period of record), no significant excess lake water would
be available for delivery to the flow-way. Only demand releases to the
Everglades were made from the lake during those periods. Water delivered to
the Everglades on a demand basis, through a flow-way, would not be efficient
due to increased travel times and increased evapotranspiration losses. The only
years in the period of record where water could flow through the flow-way for
long durations were wet periods like 1969-1970, 1982-1983, and 1994-1995. In
those years, the stages in the WCAs were already too high and additional flow
from flow-ways would have been damaging, not beneficial. Perhaps the most
important reason why flow-ways were not included in the Comprehensive Plan
was because of the significant water losses that would be unacceptable in an
ecosystem in which dry season performance was already impacted. Flow-ways
would place an additional hydrological demand on the system.
5.2.1.6 Storage South of Lake Okeechobee in the EAA
Creating above-ground reservoirs south of Lake Okeechobee in the EAA could
meet all the planning objectives:
1. Improve the timing of environmental deliveries of water to the WCAs,
2. Reduce regulatory releases of water from the EAA to the WCAs,
3. Reduce regulatory releases of water from Lake Okeechobee to the St.
Lucie and Caloosahatchee estuaries,
4. Meet agricultural demands within the EAA, and,
5. Increase flood protection within the EAA.
This option would avoid pumping water through Lake Okeechobee with its
attendant treatment requirements. It has the advantage of robust hydraulic
connections with both the lake and the EAA through the existing canals. It also
Przeglądanie stron 163
1 2 ... 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 ... 385 386

Komentarze do niniejszej Instrukcji

Brak uwag